![]() Last updated: 17 June 2002 |
This is a "User Opinions" page where YOU can express YOUR opinions. Contributions are welcome of course.
Subject: etx-90 Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 0:35:18 From: Farflekspek@aol.com How long are you going to be uncritical, technoapologist for the inexcusably slipshod work in the ETX scopes. It is all fine and good to suggest solutions for and provide a forrum for these instruments?, but the Meade king has no clothes. I do not work hard to earn money to buy a product that becomes a fixer -upper project. I expect it to be whole. For example, the flip up mirror is crap, and poorly executed. So while I enjoyed your site, I'm never,ever,ever buying from so-called Meade Instruments again! These scopes are not Instruments.Mike here: Thanks for the opinion. We all have them. I will continue to provide a support forum for ETX telescopes where users can post their positive and negative experiences.
And from AOL:
Sending message "Re: etx-90" ** Farflekspek - This member is currently not accepting e-mail.
And more from this individual:
Subject: Money money money Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 0:59:53 From: Farflekspek@aol.com I KNOW THAT YOU WORK FOR MEADE. YOUR DOING A GREAT JOB DEFENDING THE COMPANY!
Mike here: Actually I don't. I don't work at Apple either but prefer Mac OS over Windows.
And from AOL:
Sending message "Re: Money money money" ** Farflekspek - This member is currently not accepting e-mail.
Subject: In reference to the negative OPINION on Meade in the Editorial Section Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 23:57:02 From: marbla@naisp.net (Blais Klucznik) Hello Mike and the Group, Although I can fully understand a person's disillusionment with the Meade ETX, in my case the ETX125, I think Mike's site is doing a wonderful job in trying to help out a number of ETX owners getting their scopes up and running well. Sometimes it only takes a tweak to do this but in some cases a particular ETX might need a major overhaul. Yes, that is very unfortunate. I don't think there has been an ETX125 user that voiced stronger complaints about this issue than myself. Yet I had three options: (1) Return the scope to the manufacturer which I chose not to do. (2) Place the entire scope, very gently, in the trash barrel and call it an entire waste of money. (3) Make intelligent use of the valuable information available on this site. I chose the third option because unless I could get it up and running like I thought Meade should have done I really had no legitimate beef. After reading a great number of entries on this site regarding this particular model I implemented those that were well documented and directly related to the mechanical aspects which were causing my scope to function in a manner that wasn't very desirable, at least to me. To these I added some additional, albeit, bold revisions which I call The Mad Mod and now I have a ETX125 that responds the way I thought it should have when it came from the factory. It remains a joy to use even today and that spans a time of a year plus or minus some. There is a point to my purpose of writing this note. Yes Meade's product may not be what we expected. Especially when one, such as myself, had been involved for over 35 years in very rigorous quality control practices in the design and manufacture of electronic systems for the military. But conditions today are different than what they were in the past. Thus it leaves us in this dilemma. Either we pay a large amount of money for GOOD quality scopes which we purchase from companies which do not deal with mass production or we turn to the less expensive poorer quality scopes from the mass producing companies such as Meade. It is OUR choice. Yes, Meade could and should market a scope with less problems and I say this because many of the problems are caused not by design but by sloppy workmanship and very poor quality control. On the other hand is there any other mass-produced scope company out there that does it any differently? In the end we must realize that things today are different than what they were in the not to distant past. But we cannot ever go back home again. Thank You for taking the time to read this note. Sincerely Blais Klucznik marbla@naisp.net
Return to the top of this page.
Go back to the Editorials Page.
Go back to my ETX Home Page.