Last updated: 25 May 2009 |
Some ETX users have sent me examples of their astrophotography. If you have some examples you would like included here please send me a description of how you made the astrophotos and a copy of the images as GIF or JPEG files (due to internet email gateway issues, please send only one image file per message). Send to etx@me.com. Alternatively, if you have created your own web page with your examples please let me know and I'll include a link to your site. You will also find astrophotography examples on the Helpful Information - Astrophotography page.
Submitted by: Rob Roach (rob0260@hotmail.com) [25 May 09] |
---|
This image of m82 was taken May 22/09 from Teulon, Mb., Canada with my etx80 and dsi-c. 18x20s unguided and processed with envisage and registax v4. This is my first image of a galaxy. |
|
Submitted by: Rob Roach (rob0260@hotmail.com) [12 May 09] |
This is my work from May 10/09. M57 with meade dsi and etx 80. I stacked and processed with registax v4 and further processed with noiseware. Taken from Teulon, Mb., Canada. 18x5s. |
|
Submitted by: Rob Roach (rob0260@hotmail.com) [25 Feb 09] |
This is my first dso astrophoto. m42 with etx 80 and dsi-c. 18x15s processed with envisage. I tried to capture as much nebulosity as I could, hence the overexposed core. taken feb. 22/09 from my dark sky site near Teulon, Mb., Canada. BTW the temperature was -22c. with a light breeze. My observatory offered some protection from the wind but still, brrrrrrr. Can't wait until I get my warm room setup. |
|
Submitted by: Steve Hollar (sjhollar@dslextreme.com) [3 Feb 09] |
Here is a photo I took last night using the 125PE and DSI. I was able to get a much focus now
that I am using the JMI Electric Focuser. Getting a good calibration as
mentioned in my other email certainly made a huge difference too. They
were all taken in Alt/Az alignment. I did some more post processing on the Orion Nebula. I think it looks a whole lot better than the one I sent you yesterday. This was taken in FTS format with the DSI. It is only 22, 2 second exposures. It looks like FTS is the way to go. It amazes me how much detail can be brought out of an otherwise dark image with some careful post processing. |
|
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2008 for photos posted July-November 2008.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2008 for photos posted February-June 2008.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2007 for photos posted July-November 2007.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2007 for photos posted February-June 2007.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2006 for photos posted October-December 2006.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2006 for photos posted August-September 2006.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2006 for photos posted March-July 2006.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2006 for photos posted January-February 2006.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2005 for photos posted October-November 2005.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2005 for photos posted August-September 2005.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2005 for photos posted April-July 2005.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2005 for photos posted January-March 2005.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2004 for photos posted October-December 2004.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2004 for photos posted July-September 2004.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2004 for photos posted April-June 2004.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2004 for photos posted January-March 2004.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2003 for photos posted in 2003.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2002 for photos posted in 2002.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2001 for photos posted in 2001.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 2000 for photos posted in 2000.
See the Guest Deep Sky Archive 1999 for photos taken 1999 and earlier.
Return to the top of this page.
Go back to my ETX Home Page.